C Extra Trading Co.,Ltd.The fresh new genealogists all the consider this tall you to definitely Nicholas’ partner Clementia are incorporated here because, less than typical circumstances, she would never be said. Whenever Susanna in the certain later on time received over to a unique protector, the new spouse of these protector was not said.
This will imply that King John invested sometime truth be told there and you will the possibility of an amorous liaison that have Clementia can be found
Here are some is an idea advanced from the some eminent genealogists, however it is fair to declare that new conclusions was hotly competitive!
So it principle causes a delightful and you can interested ‘twist’ on facts regarding Joanna, which could focus fans from HBD!
On top, there is nothing to recommend people relationship between the hostage, Susanna of Wales and you will Clementia, wife off Nicholas de Verdun. Yet not, the experience of certain genealogists which have overseas hostages, particularly young ones, might have been which they was often place with members of the family, or no have been readily available.
Moving toward 1236, you will find an entry from the Tewkesbury annals which applies to Joanna’s mommy since the “King Clemencie!” They checks out in part:
Now, we know that mom off Joanna was entitled Clementia (Clemence?
In this case brand new monk try plainly indulging within the gothic legalism. Prior to her passing, Joanna is legitimised by Pope. Based on one legitimisation, this new Tewksbury monk obviously took it upon himself to elevate Joanna’s mom into the reputation off King, as if their mom ended up being King John’s partner! It is a fact however, that King John and Clementia was indeed never ever hitched. Because of the discussing Joanna’s mother as the “Queen” Clementia, the fresh new monk whom filed Joanna’s death try demonstrating their high esteem to own Joanna, not attempting to alter the real activities.
Are you aware that identity out of Clementia de Verdun, Paget shows that she was the fresh new daughter out-of Roger de Dauntsey, out-of Wiltshire. One to genealogist takes into account they high that Clementia regarded off Wiltshire since the he has noticed that King John had an effective connection in order to one county, they being the family out of their safest partners, brand new Longespee, ilies and you can Geoffrey Fitz Peter.
Genealogists have discovered that the name ‘Clementia’ was very rare certainly one of English noblewomen regarding the months. In one desk from ladies’ names which had been gathered, there were simply a couple occurrences of the term “Clementia” off a total of 1407 ladies in the newest try! The fact some one named Clementia will be in the Susanna is recognized as tall.
Therefore! Evidence is actually suggestive, but not conclusive, that in the 1228, Susanna, since an excellent hostage, received out over the brand new proper care of their own maternal granny, now partner regarding Nicholas de Verdun!!
New Scottish genealogists of your kvinner Turkmenistani MacDuffs’ hold that Susanna ferch Llywelyn was created 1214 when you look at the Gwynnedd, Wales and you will passed away c. 1259 into the Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland. She married Malcolm MacDuff, Earl out of Fife in 1230 along with a couple people: Sir Colbran MacDuff, Earl from Fife, born 1245, died 1270 and you may MacDuff MacDuff created 1247.
Needless to say, you will find restrict objections to all this conjecture! Queen John got many mistresses and perhaps possibly seven illegitimate people. The caretaker away from Joanna would have been born circa 1172 and marriageable circa 1184. Joanna herself was created circa 1191 (fourteen years of age during the time of their particular wedding in order to Llywelyn). Rohese, the brand new recognized legitimate child away from Nicholas de Verdun and his spouse Clementia came to be circa 1210-1213. In the event the Clementia is actually the caretaker away from Joanna, she’d are in their later 30’s, very early 40’s when having a baby to Rohese! Not hopeless, certain state, however, improbable.
Join the conversation